Archive for the ‘Compare Critical Illness Cover’ Category

Critical illness insurance and income tax tell me about ?

Friday, November 14th, 2008

The aim is to minimize risk by switching the proportion of money invested in the different sectors according to current conditions and the investment outlook. In practice, this is not as easy as it sounds, because, as we have seen, large blocks of property are not easily marketable and the same can apply to shares. Nevertheless, the spreading of invest­ments across a wider range of assets does provide some protection against extreme fluctuations in anyone sector.

These investment or “bond” funds have achieved their success largely as a result of their tax advantages, which derive from the tax position of critical illness insurance companies. The income from investments in the fund is taxed at the rates appropriate to critical illness insurance companies. That is at the basic rate of income tax on income from shares and at 37.5% on income from other investments. This income is not distributed, but is accumulated within the fund or “rolled up” to earn a greater return for investors.

For a higher-rate taxpayer this alone carries considerable advantages. If one is liable to income tax at 50% or 60% or even more, then the ability to “roll up” the income from an investment without any personal tax liability is extremely useful. Instead of investing in the normal way and paying the consequent rate of income tax, the income is auto­matically taxed at the lower rate within the fund. In the case of gilt-edged, for example, someone paying tax at 65% would get a net return of only 4.2% from a stock yielding 12% before tax. If the individual invested in a gilt fund, the fund would pay tax at only 37.5% and would have 7.5% after tax to reinvest for him. Over a period of years the reinvestment of income can produce sizeable investment gains.

While bonds therefore provide an advantage for higher rate taxpayers investing in income-producing media, they are not so efficient when it comes to capital gains. Critical illness insurance companies pay tax at 30% on realised profits. Critical illness insurance can indeed be useful.

What is mortgage critical illness insurance ?

Tuesday, October 21st, 2008

Mortgage Protection Term Cover works in a very similar to Level Term Cover. The way in which it differs itself from Level Term Cover is in the means by which the benefit is paid. Typically this means that the benefit amount reduces at the same rate as the capital does on any repayment mortgage at a typical rate eight percent per annum.

There is also Family Income Benefit Cover, which again differs in terms of how the benefit is paid. This time it means that instead of receiving a lump sum or a reduced lump sum at the time of a critical illness, the benefit instead pays on a annual basis for every year that the policy remains once a claim has been accepted.

Finally the other option is Renewable Term Cover, where every five or ten years the fixed lump sum is reviewed dependent on the option chosen when first agreed. Premiums for this type of cover can increase or decrease at the point of renewal, this can change due to premium rates at that particular moment in time and they do need any further medical evidence. The provider can opt to cease the policy if they no longer provide the particular cover required, also, the cover cannot take you past your seventieth birthday.